29 May, 2012 16:03
ISLAMABAD TONIGHT
WITH NADEEM MALIK
29-05-2012
گزشتہ چار سالوں میں پاکستان کا گروتھ ریٹ پچھلے پچاس سالوں کا کم ترین ریٹ رہا ہے۔ اسد عمر کی اسلام آباد ٹونائٹ میں گفتگو
افریقہ کے بعض ممالک اور ساؤتھ ایشیا کے تمام ممالک سے پاکستان کا گروتھ ریٹ دوگنا سے بھی کم ہے۔ اسد عمر
پاکستان کی معیشت کو سب سے زیادہ نقصان انرجی کے بحران کی وجہ سے ہوا ہے۔ ڈاکٹر فرخ سلیم
کپاس کی علمی قیمتوں میں اچانک پچاس فیصد اضافہ سے براآمدات میں کچھ بہتری رہی۔ فرخ سلیم
اس وقت آئی پی پی کے تقریبا ڈھائی سو ارب روپے واجب الادا ہیں۔ عبداللہ یوسف
حکومت پیسے اور گیس دے دے تو ایک رات میں بجلی کی پیداوار دو ہزار میگا واٹ بڑھ سکتی ہے۔عبداللہ یوسف
جسے ہم سرکلر ڈیٹ کہتے ہیں وہ حقیقت میں باقاعدہ چوری ہے۔ فرخ سلیم
دنیا میں کوئلہ پچاس فیصد بجلی پیدا کی جاتی ہے جبکہ پاکستان میں صرف ایک فیصد۔اسد عمر
بجلی کی پیداواری لاگت کم کرنے کے جو اقدامات اٹھانے چاہییں تھے ان میں سے ایک بھی نہیں اٹھایا گیا۔ اسد عمر
چار سال پہلے گیس کی چوری تقریبا پانچ فیصد تھی جو اب پندرہ فیصد ہو چکی ہے۔ فرخ سلیم
پچھلے چار سالوں میں پاکستان کے قرضوں کا بوجھ چھ ہزار ارب روپے بڑھ چکا ہے۔ اسد عمر
جب تک پاکستان میں باقاعدہ ٹیکس کا نظام نہیں آئے گا بجٹ خسارہ ختم نہیں ہو سکتا۔ اسد عمر
پچھلے چار سالوں میں معیشت کی بہتری کے لئیے کوئی بڑا قدم نہیں اٹھایا گیا۔ عبداللہ یوسف
جتنا ٹیکس ہم اکٹھا کر رہے ہیں ہم اس سے اناسی فیصد اور زیادہ اکٹھا کر سکتے ہیں۔ عبداللہ یوسف
حکومت کا بینظیر انکم پروگرام ایک اچھا اقدام رہا ہے۔ فرخ سلیم
چار سالوں میں سرکلر ڈیٹ، لوڈ شیڈنگ اور گیس کی کمی زیرو ہو سکتی ہے۔ اسد عمر
حکومت منصوبے تو بناتی ہے لیکن عملی طور پر کچھ نہیں کر رہی۔ عدباللہ یوسف
اس وقت ریونیو بڑھانے اور خرچے کم کرنے کی ضرورت ہے۔ فرخ سلیم
حکومت کو فوری طور پر زرعی ٹیکس لگانا چاہئیے۔اسد عمر
29 May, 2012 03:24
http://www.awaztoday.com/News-Talk-Shows/23592/Islamabad-Tonight-28th-May-2012.aspx
http://www.zemtv.com/2012/05/28/islamabad-tonight-on-aaj-news-28th-may-2012/
http://www.friendskorner.com/forum/f247/video-islamabad-tonight-nadeem-malik-28th-may-2012-j-r-wajih-uddin-khawaj-asif-faisal-kareem-277880/
ISLAMABAD TONIGHT
WITH NADEEM MALIK
28-05-2012
TOPIC- SPEAKER RULING ON PM
GUESTS- JUSTICE WAJIH UD DIN, KHWAJA MOHAMMAD ASIF, FAISAL KARIM KUNDI
JUSTICE (R) WAJIH UD DIN OF PTI said that in India speaker has right to give his ruling but not in Pakistan. He said that it is not true that PM is not declared disqualified in SC decision he has served his sentence. He said that PM himself said that if he will be convicted he will go home. He said that Sindh high court ordered to chairman senate to take oath from Asif Zardari and let him participate in the session and the order was implemented.
He said that the research needed to be done on the issue of dual nationality because overseas Pakistanis send 12 billion dollars remittance to the country.
He said that SC is playing a pivotal role in Pakistan right now. He said that the youth of Pakistan is angry at the moment but hope is dominating on their anger. He said that the dream of Pakistan after the restoration of judiciary is not fulfilled but the struggle is going on.
KHWAJA MOHAMMAD ASIF OF PML-N said that speaker gave her ruling in the favour of PM on the advice of her leadership. He said that PML-N has said in the SC that PM is convicted and his government is illegal. He said that the decision to not to appeal in the contempt case by PM has completed the proceedings of the case. He said that speaker of the assembly has mentioned the accusations against PM in her ruling but not the punishment. He said that what kind of constitutional argument is this which gives immunity both to PM and president. He said that a corrupt regime is ruling on Pakistan who is destroying the country.
He said that to discussing the issue of election commissioner and care taker set up with the government is a constitutional requirement. He said that PML-N has no clear point of view on the issue of dual nationality but soon it will be known.
FAISAL KARIM KUNDI OF PPPP said that every body should not interpret the decision of SC of his own and the ruling of the speaker is correct. He said that there is no question of disqualification of PM is raised in the decision of SC. He said that the decision of the speaker is according to the constitution and and it can not be challenged.
–
28 May, 2012 16:03
ISLAMABAD TONIGHT
WITH NADEEM MALIK
28-05-2012
بھارت میں سپیکر اسمبلی کو اپنا فیصلہ دینے کا اختیار ہے لیکن پاکستان میں نہیں۔ جسٹس وجیہہ الدین کی اسلام آباد ٹونائٹ میں گفتگو
سپیکر اسمبلی نے اپنی قیادت کے کہنے پر وزیراعظم کے حق میں رولنگ دی ہے۔ خواجہ آصف
ہم نے عدالت میں کہا ہے کہ وزیراعظم سزا یافتہ ہیں اور حکومت غیر قانونی ہے۔ خواجہ آصف
ہر کسی کو اپنی مرضی کی تشریح نہیں کرنا چاہئیے سپیکر کا فیصلہ درست ہے۔ فیصل کریم کنڈی
عدالت کے فیصلہ میں وزیراعظم کی نااہلی کا سوال ہی نہیں اٹھایا گیا۔ فیصل کریم کنڈی
یہ کہنا درست نہیں کہ وزیراعظم کو نا اہل نہیں قرار دیا گیا وہ اپنی سزا بھی لاٹ چکے ہیں۔ جسٹس وجیہہ الدین
وزیراعظم نے خود کہا تھا کہ انہیں سزا ہوئی تو وہ گھر چلے جایں گے۔ جسٹس وجیہہ الدین
وزیراعظم کے اپیل نہ کرنے کے فیصلہ۹ سے نا اہلی کا کیس مکمل ہو گیا۔ خواجہ آصف
سپیکر صاحبہ نے اپنے فیصلہ میں وزیراعظم پر الزامات کا تو زکر کیا ہے لیکن سزا کا نہیں۔ خواجہ آصف
سپیکر نے اپنا فیصلہ آئین اور قانون کے مطابق دیا ہے اور یہ چیلنج نہیں ہو سکتا۔ فیصل کریم کنڈی
یہ کونسا آئین ہے کہ جس میں صدر وزیراعظم دونوں کو استثنی حاصل ہے۔ خواجہ آصف
سندھ ہائی کورٹ نے زرداری کو سینٹ کا حلف لینے اور اجلاس میں بلانے کا حکم دیا تھا اور اس پر عمل بھی ہوا تھا۔ جسٹس وجیہہ الدین
اس وقت پاکستان پر چوروں کی حکومت ہے جو ملک کو تباہ کر رہی ہے۔ خواجہ آصف
حکومت سے الیکشن کمشنر اور عبوری حکومت کے مسئلے پر بات کرنا آئینی ضرورت ہے۔ خواجہ آصف
دوہری شہریت کے مسئلہ پر مسلم لیگ ن کا کوئی واضع موقف نہیں ہے لیکن اس پر جلد اپنا نقطہ نظر دیں گے۔خواجہ آصف
دوہری شہریت کے مسئلہ پر ریسرچ ہونی چاہئیے تارکین وطن ہر سال بارہ ارب ڈالر پاکستان بھیجتے ہیں۔ جسٹس وجہہ الدین
سپریم کورٹ اس وقت پاکستان میں بہت اہم کردار ادا کر رہی ہے۔ جسٹس وجیہہ الدین
پاکستان کا نوجوان اس وقت ناراض ہے لیکن اس کی ناراضگی پر امید حاوی ہے۔ جسٹس وجیہہ الدین
عدلیہ کی بحالی کے بعد کے پاکستان کو خواب پورا نہیں ہوا لیکن جدوجہد جاری ہے۔جسٹس وجیہہ الدین
26 May, 2012 06:12
http://www.awaztoday.com/News-Talk-Shows/23498/Islamabad-Tonight-25th-May-2012.aspx
http://www.zemtv.com/2012/05/25/islamabad-tonight-on-aaj-news-25th-may-2012/
http://www.friendskorner.com/forum/f247/video-islamabad-tonight-nadeem-malik-25th-may-2012-a-277540/
http://www.pakistanherald.com/Program/Islamabad-Tonight-May-24-2012-Nadeem-Malik-10773
ISLAMABAD TONIGHT
WITH NADEEM MALIK
25-05-2012
TOPIC- OVERALL POLITICAL SITUATION OF PAKISTAN
GUESTS- MUSHAHID ULLAH KHAN, DR SHAHID MASOOD, FAROOQUE AMJAD MIR
MUSHAHID ULLAH KHAN OF PML-N said that he is agreed with Balawal Bhutto that Musharaf is responsible for the killing of Benazir Bhutto. He said that Musharaf was seen off by Zardari giving red carpet goodbye. He said that Rehman Malik has huge businesses in London and Spain and how he got so much money should be investigated.
He said that law should be constituted on dual nationality which could not be challenged.
He said that it seems that speaker of the assembly had decided to play the role of the speaker of the Peoples Party. He said that elections are the solution of the chaos in the country.
DR SHAHID MASOOD TV ANCHOR said that Musharaf visited the senior minister of the government Ch Pervez Ilahi in London hospital today. He said that many of the senior leaders of Peoples Party also used to meet Musharaf. He said that people with dual nationality should have right to vote but should not participate in the government. He said that Pakistan is a strange country where Moeen Qureshi became PM who was not even the citizen of the country. He said that what if some one will have dual nationality with India and be the part of the government.
FAROOQUE AMJAD MIR OF PTI said that the government at the time of the murder of Benazir had some kind of role to play in it. He said that this matter should be investigated that who is the main beneficiary of Benazir murder. He said that the matter of people with dual nationality can become part of the government should be considered with care. He said that people living overseas make money and send it to Pakistan and they should have right to take part in politics.
He said that it is clearly written in the constitution that a person ridicule SC can not be the member of the parliament. He said that the speaker of the assembly only showed her loyalness with Peoples Party. He said that after the decision of SC Yousuf Raza Gillani is not the PM of Pakistan any more. He said that it is a matter of few days only and PM will be leaving.
He said that his party is doing its level best and will force the government to hold new elections in the country.
–
25 May, 2012 16:01
ISLAMABAD TONIGHT
WITH NADEEM MALIK
25-05-2012
میں بلاول بھٹو سے اتفاق کرتا ہوں بینظیر کو مشرف نے قتل کروایا تھا۔ مشاہداللہ کی اسلام آباد ٹونائٹ میں گفتگو
بینظیر کے قاتل مشرف کو خود آصف زرداری نے ریڈ کارپٹ الوداع کہہ کر اس ملک سے رخصت کیا تھا۔ مشاہد اللہ
بینظیر کی شہادت میں اس وقت کی حکومت کا کچھ نہ کچھ حصہ ضرور تھا۔ فاروق امجد میر
اس بات کی تحقیقات ہونی چاہییں کہ بینظیر کی شہادت کا سب سے زیادہ فائدہ کس کو ہوا۔ فاروق امجد میر
مشرف نے آج حکومت کے سینئیر وزیر پرویز الہی کی لندن ہسپتال میں عیادت کی ہے۔ ڈاکٹر شاہد مسعود
پیپلز پارٹی کی اعلی قیادت کے لوگ بھی پرویز مشرف سے ملتے رہے ہیں۔ شاہد مسعود
رحمان ملک کے لندن اور سپین میں بڑے کاروبار ہیں اتنی دولت کہاں سے آئی پتہ لگانا چاہئیے۔ مشاہداللہ
دوہری شہریت والا حکومت کا حصہ بن سکتا ہے یا نہیں اس پر احتاط کے ساتھ غور کرنے کی ضرورت ہے۔ فاروق امجد میر
ملک سے باہر رہنے والے لوگ دولت کما کر پاکستان بھیجتے ہیں انہیں سیاست میں حصہ لینے کا حق ہونا چاہئیے۔ فاروق امجد میر
دوہری شہریت والوں کو ووٹ کا حق ہونا چاہئیے لیکن حکومت میں نہیں شامل کرنا چاہئیے۔ شاہد مسعود
پاکستان عجیب ملک ہے جہاں معین قریشی جیسا شخص وزیراعظم بن گیا جو پاکستانی شہری ہی نہیں تھا ۔شاہد مسعود
اس طرح تو کوئی شخص پاکستان کے ساتھ ساتھ بھارت کی شہریت بھی رکھ سکتا ہے۔ شاہد مسعود
دوہری شہریت کے مسئلے پر ایسی قانون سازی ہونی چاہئیے جسے کوئی چیلنج نہ کر سکے۔ مشاہداللہ
آئین میں واضع طور پر لکھا ہے کہ سپریم کورٹ کی توہین کرنے والا پارلیمنٹ کا رکن نہیں رہ سکتا۔ فاروق امجد میر
سپیکر صاحبہ نے صرف پیپلز پارٹی سے اپنی وفاداری نباہی ہے۔ فاروق امجد میر
سپریم کورٹ کے فیصلے کے بعد یوسف رضا گیلانی وزیراعظم نہیں ہیں۔ فاروق امجد میر
لگتا ہے سپیکر صاحبہ نے پہلے سے پیپلز پارٹی کی سپیکر کا کردار ادا کرنے کا فیصلہ کیا ہوا تھا۔ مشاہد اللہ
میرے خیال میں چند دنوں کی بات ہے وزیراعظم جا رہے ہیں۔ فاروق امجد میر
پاکستان کے مسائل کا حل اب صرف نئے انتخابات ہیں ۔ فاروق امجد میر
جب بھی بحران پیدا ہو انتخابات ہی حل ہوتے ہیں۔مشاہد اللہ
ہم حکومت کے خلاف اپنا کردار ادا کر رہے ہیں اور اسے انتخابات پر مجبور کر دیں گے۔ فاروق امجد میر
Ruling of Speaker Dr. Fehmida Mirza in Favour of PM Gilani
Nadeem Malik
RULING
IN THE MATTER OF SYED YOUSAF RAZA GILLANI, PRIME MINISTER OF PAKISTN UNDER CLAUSE (2) OF ARTICLE 63 OF THE CONSTITUTION
1.The Criminal Petition No.06 of 2012 in Suo Motu case No.4 of 2010 was decided by the Supreme Court of Pakistan vide Short Order dated 26.4.2012 whereby the Prime Minister of Pakistan was punished under Section 5 of Contempt of Court Ordinance, 2003 (Ordinance V of 2003) with imprisonment till the rising of the Court. Sentence was executed forthwith. The detailed judgment was released on 8.5.2012. Both the Orders have been conveyed to me.
2.Meanwhile, on 30.4.2012, a reference under clause (2) of Article 63 by Moulvi Iqbal Haider was also received in my office. He prayed for referring the question of disqualification of Syed Yousaf Raza Gillani from being a member, to the Election Commission, as he has become disqualified from being a member of the Assembly due to his conviction by the Supreme Court of Pakistan under Contempt of Court Law.
3.I have gone through the said reference application, the Short Order and detailed judgment of the Supreme Court. I have also gone through the relevant provisions of the Constitution and the Contempt of Court Ordinance, 2003.
4.Before proceeding further, I may like to show my serious concerns regarding letters through which Short Order and detailed judgment of the Supreme Court were separately conveyed by the Assistant Registrar writing for Registrar and addressed directly to the Speaker. The Speaker holds a constitutional position. She is an elected head of the House and guardian of the rights of 342 Members of the country, representing the will of the people of Pakistan. The provision of clause (2) of Article 72 of the Constitution confers the privilege upon the Speaker to preside over a Joint Sittings of the Majlis-e-Shora (Parliament), comprising 446 members. She may often require to perform the functions of the President of Pakistan under Article 49. The Speaker is placed in Article 2 of Warrant of Precedence. In view of the above, the office of the Speaker demands the highest respect from other organs of the State and functionaries of the Government. The contents of the letters are in bad taste and also against the parliamentary norms and traditions.
5.Now coming to the point as to whether any question arises for disqualification of a member from being a Member of Parliament under clause (2) of Article 63 of the Constitution on the basis of material and information placed before me and the powers and jurisdiction of the Speaker under the said Article. I may like to reproduce the provision of clause (2) of Article 63 as under:-
“If any question arises whether a member of the Majlis-e-Shoora (Parliament) has become disqualified from being a member, the Speaker or, as the case may be, the Chairman shall, unless he decides that no such question has arisen, refer the question to the Election Commission within thirty days and if he fails to do so within the aforesaid period it shall be deemed to have been referred to the Election Commission.”
6.It would be advantageous here to quote the case law on the subject. It has been held in Kanwar Intizar Muhammad Khan VS Federation of Pakistan and others reported in 1995 MLD Lahore 1903 that the Speaker while examining a reference under Article 63 (2) of the Constitution is not supposed to act merely as post office. If a reference is submitted to him, he is not bound to forward/transmit the same, to the Chief Election Commissioner for decision forthwith. The Speaker has to apply his own mind judiciously after fully taking into consideration the relevant provisions on the subject and then decide as to whether “any question” in the nature of disqualification has “arisen” which may justify the making of reference to the Chief Election Commissioner.” The same view was also expressed by Supreme Court of Pakistan in PLD 2005 SC 52.
7.The Supreme Court framed the following charge against Syed Yousaf Raza Gillani, Prime Minister of Pakistan:-
“That you, Syed Yousaf Raza Gillani, the Prime Minister of Pakistan, have willfully flouted, disregarded and disobeyed the direction given by this Court in para 178 in case of Dr. Mobashir Hassan v Federation of Pakistan (PLD 2010 SC 265)” to revive the request by the Government of Pakistan for mutual legal assistance and status of civil party and the claims lodged to the allegedly laundered moneys lying in foreign countries, including Switzerland, which were unauthorizedly withdrawn by communication by Malik Muhammad Qayyum, former Attorney General for Pakistan to the concerned authorities, which direction you were legally bound to obey and thereby committed contempt of Court within the meanings of Article 204 (2) of the Constitution of Islamic Republic of Pakistan, 1973 read with section 3 of the Contempt of Court Ordinance (Ordinance V of 2003), punishable under Section 5 of the Ordinance and within the cognizance of this Court. We hereby direct that you be tried by this Court on the above said charge.”
8.It appears from above, that no specific charge regarding the propagation of any opinion or acting in any manner against the independence of the judiciary or defaming or ridiculing the judiciary as contemplated under Article 63 (1) (g) has been framed.
9.I may like to cite here the case of Mr. Makhdoom Javed Hashmi, the then MNA who, vide judgment dated: 12th April, 2004 passed by Sessions Judge, Islamabad in Session case No.52 of 2003 was convicted and sentenced to imprisonment of 19 years in aggregate under sections124-A/131/109/505 (a)/ 468/471/500/469, PPC.
10. Makhdoom Javed Hashmi, MNA on 26.08.2004 filed three separate nomination papers as candidate for ascertainment of the Leader of the House. The Government side raised objection that Mr. Hashmi being convicted is no more Member of National Assembly as he has become disqualified under Article 63 (1) (g) for propagating and defaming the Armed Forces of Pakistan, therefore, he cannot be a candidate for ascertainment of the Leader of the House and his nomination papers be rejected. However the former Speaker of the National Assembly over ruled the objection and accepted the nomination papers of Mr. Hashmi on 26.08.2004 and accordingly the Secretariat made all the arrangements/preparations for ascertainment of the Leader of the House for 27.8.2004 between two contesting candidates i.e. Mr. Shoukat Aziz and Makhdoom Javed Hashmi.
11. In the light of what has been stated above, I am of the view that the charges against Syed Yousaf Raza Gillani are not relatable to the grounds mentioned in paragraph (g) or (h) of clause (1) of Article 63, therefore, no question of disqualification of Syed Yousaf Raza Gillani from being a member arises under clause (2) of Article 63 of the Constitution. The letters of the Assistant Registrar (IMP) for Registrar of the Supreme Court stands answered accordingly. Furthermore, the petition of Moulvi Iqbal Haider, Advocate being without any merit, is not maintainable and accordingly rejected.
Sd/
DR. FEHMIDA MIRZA
Speaker
National Assembly
Dated: 24th May, 2012
Islamabad.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
25 May, 2012 00:13
http://www.awaztoday.com/News-Talk-Shows/23453/Islamabad-Tonight-24th-May-2012.aspx
http://www.zemtv.com/2012/05/24/islamabad-tonight-on-aaj-news-24th-may-2012/
http://www.friendskorner.com/forum/f247/video-islamabad-tonight-nadeem-malik-24th-may-2012-humayu-akhtar-akram-sheikh-amir-khan-277422/
http://www.pakistanherald.com/Program/Islamabad-Tonight-May-24-2012-Nadeem-Malik-10773
ISLAMABAD TONIGHT
WITH NADEEM MALIK
24-05-2012
TOPIC- SPEAKER RULING ON PM PUNISHMENT, DEMAND FOR MUHAJIR PROVINCE
GUESTS- JUSTICE TARIQ MAHMOOD, AKRAN SHEIKH, HUMAYYON AKHTER KHAN, AMIR KHAN
JUSTICE (R) TARIQ MAHMOOD said that speaker of the assembly can not put aside the decision of the SC.
AKRAM SHEIKH A LAWYER said that SC decision does not depend on the opinion of the speaker of the assembly. He said that there was no better expectation from the speaker of the assembly than her ruling. He said that election commission will be justified to issue disqualifying notice to PM after the completion of thirty days limit.
HUMAYYON AKHTER KHAN OF PML (LIKE MINDED) said that SC gave a legal decision and not a political decision against PM. He said that according to political decision SC would have disqualified PM itself. He said that now we will see that what kind of decision election commission takes on the issue. He said that if the election commission gives disqualifying decision against PM an appeal will be filed and the issue will be dragged. He said that now the only way to call new elections is if allied parties decide to support opposition. He said that people used to look towards GHQ for the solution of their problems but now they look towards the SC. He said that he says now to the people that if not any body else at least fear from Allah.
He said that only Sindhis and Muhajirs can decide the topic of the division of the Sindh. He said that the economy of the country has been deteriorated and the government is printing new notes every day. He said that PPPP does not exist in the Punjab any more and the real competition will be between PML-N and PTI in the next elections.
AMIR KHAN OF MQM said that PM case is in the SC yet and he does not want to give any opinion on it. He said that the people demanding Muhajir province belong to MQM but they have right to express their own opinion. He said that Altaf Hussain has clearly said that he does not want the division of the Sindh. He said that Rabita committee of MQM is trying to talk to the people demanding Muhajir province. He said that MQM has nothing to do with the people demanding Muhajir province but their demand should be considered. He said that the anti Pakistan slogans were raised in the rally of the nationalists. He said that elections should be held on time and democratic process should continue.
–
